Book a Growth Consultation
Experimentation as a Service

You're running experiments. You're not running a system.

We help mid-market and private equity companies between $30M and $500M ARR turn scattered growth experiments into one connected system - strategy, delivery infrastructure, and revenue optimization working together, so a result that works in one team doesn't just die there.

  • Strategy consulting
  • Delivery infrastructure
  • Revenue optimization
  • Built on real data
The Gap

Where the win stops traveling.

  1. C-SUITE / EXECUTIVE

    Every experiment that works stays exactly where it started.

    You've watched a good result surface in one team and go nowhere - no system exists to notice it, validate it against revenue, or push it out to the rest of the business. It just becomes a story someone tells in a meeting once.

    → STAYS ISOLATED
  2. REVOPS LEADERSHIP

    The infrastructure for testing doesn't exist.

    Process documentation, MarTech, and operations live in separate systems maintained by separate teams - so even when someone wants to run a coordinated experiment, there's no shared foundation to run it on.

    → NO SHARED FOUNDATION
  3. MARKETING LEADERSHIP

    A campaign wins. Nobody builds on it.

    Attribution and results live in one dashboard, one person's head, one quarter. Without a framework connecting today's win to tomorrow's roadmap, marketing keeps rediscovering the same insight from scratch.

    → WINS DON'T COMPOUND
  4. SALES LEADERSHIP

    A pricing test moves deals. Nobody proves it.

    The change felt right, reps liked it, and it never got measured against actual pipeline and revenue - so it can't be defended, scaled, or repeated with confidence.

    → NO REVENUE PROOF
Value Leakage

The value leaks between the test and the system.

  • NO SHARED FRAMEWORK
  • RESULTS NEVER SCALE
  • DISCONNECTED INITIATIVES
  • NO REVENUE VALIDATION
Experiment run Result measured Insight documented Shared across teams Becomes standard practice

You're already running the experiments. The gap is between what a test proves and what the business actually adopts - and it compounds every quarter nobody closes it.

Maturity

The four stages of an experimentation program.

Isolated tests

Individual teams run experiments independently - no shared framework connects one test to the next.

STG-01
Documented, not scaled

Results get written down somewhere - nothing systematically turns a win into standard practice.

STG-02
Connected, not validated

Experimentation feeds a shared process - but results rarely get tied back to real revenue.

STG-03
A continuous system

Strategy, delivery, and revenue optimization work as one tested loop - winners get scaled on evidence, not enthusiasm.

STG-04
The Promise

What changes after the system is in place.

In focus

One framework, every result.

A win in one team gets recognized and adopted everywhere else - because strategy, delivery, and revenue optimization finally run as one connected system instead of three separate departments.

THE PROMISE
Next

A backlog prioritized by revenue, not novelty.

Experiments get sequenced by potential impact - not by whichever idea is easiest to test this week.

PRIORITIZATION
Next

Infrastructure built before the first test runs.

Process documentation, MarTech, and operations get organized into a real system - so testing has somewhere to live instead of depending on one person's initiative.

INFRASTRUCTURE
Next

Every result validated against revenue.

A promising test gets confirmed against pipeline and ROI before the company invests further - not adopted on a good feeling in a meeting.

VALIDATION
Next

Winners become standard practice, deliberately.

A defined scaling process turns a single successful experiment into how the company operates - not a story that fades by next quarter.

SCALING
Next

A team that keeps running it after we leave.

Documentation and training mean the framework survives past the engagement - this isn't a consulting deck, it's a system your team owns.

HANDOFF
Methodology

The DevriX Experimentation Method.

Six stages across a twelve-week framework. We build the strategy and the infrastructure before running a single test - because an experiment with nowhere to scale is just an interesting result nobody acts on.

Phase 01 / 06 · WEEKS 1–4 · STRATEGY CONSULTING

Before anything gets tested, decide what actually matters to the business.

We start with your goals and set KPIs grounded in real market research and technology consulting - not a generic growth playbook stretched to fit every client the same way. This means understanding your competitive position, your buyer segments, and where the biggest levers for growth actually sit, before a single experiment gets designed. Most companies skip this step and go straight to testing, which is how you end up with a portfolio of clever experiments that don't add up to a strategy.

Output

A documented growth strategy with defined goals and KPIs, grounded in your actual market position.

The Stack

The tools, and why these ones.

Our tools are chosen because they enable each step of the workflow - not because they're the best-known platforms in the category.

One connected system
Stack I

CRM & Revenue Data

HUBSPOT · SALESFORCE

We validate every experiment against the CRM data your business already runs on, so results connect directly to pipeline and revenue, not a separate analytics silo nobody checks.

Stack II

Experimentation & Analytics

VWO · OPTIMIZELY · GA4

We run and measure experiments on whichever platform actually fits your stack, coordinated through the same strategy and reporting, not managed as separate, disconnected tools.

Stack III

Synthesis & Insight

CLAUDE AI

Used to analyze experiment results and market data at scale, surfacing patterns and prioritizing what to test next faster than manual analysis allows. It structures the input; the data decides the output.

Deliverables

What you walk away with.

Deliverable 01

Growth Strategy and KPIs

A documented strategy grounded in your actual market and revenue goals.

Deliverable 02

Delivery Infrastructure

A real operating system for experimentation to run inside, not individual effort.

Deliverable 03

Live, Validated Experiments

Coordinated tests, measured against real revenue impact, not vanity metrics.

Deliverable 04

Scaling Playbook and Training

A documented process and a trained team that keeps the system running after we leave.

Typical engagement runs the full twelve-week framework - strategy, infrastructure, and revenue optimization - with experimentation continuing afterward as an ongoing program.

Case 04 // HubSpot to Salesforce Migration

A forms-driven site moved before the contract expired.

An expiring HubSpot contract left a narrow window to consolidate sales and marketing into Salesforce. Forms were spread across multiple content types and embedded through several different methods. We planned the migration, replaced every element tied to the old automation tool and kept the site running through the switch.

  • Full form inventory across content types and embed methods
  • No interruption to lead capture during the transition
  • Launch phase closed within the agreed week
Read the full case study
Who This Is For

Who this is for.

Mid-market and private equity companies between $30M and $500M ARR - SaaS, technology services, professional services, fintech, healthtech, energy.

01

CEOs, COOs, CFOs

You're dealing with
  • Outdated expertise holding the company back from confidently exploring new strategies
  • Too many competing priorities keeping a real experimentation system off the roadmap
  • No visibility into whether growth initiatives are producing revenue, or just activity
You'll get
  • Strategic scaling guidance grounded in real data, not outdated assumptions
  • Risk mitigation through structured, data-driven testing before major investment
  • Clear visibility into which growth initiatives are actually producing revenue
02

RevOps Managers & Directors

You're dealing with
  • Process documentation, MarTech, and operations scattered with no unified system
  • Manual coordination required every time an experiment spans multiple departments
  • Data silos that make it impossible to see one view of what's actually working
You'll get
  • A real operating system for experimentation, not more manual coordination
  • Data integration and reporting that shows the full picture
  • Cross-functional workflow connecting strategy, delivery, and revenue teams
03

Marketing Directors & VPs

You're dealing with
  • Campaigns that test well once and never become a repeatable process
  • No framework for prioritizing which experiments are actually worth running
  • MarTech not built to support continuous, coordinated testing
You'll get
  • A pipeline built on a continuously tested and optimized system
  • Attribution and ROI measurement across every experiment you run
  • MarTech that supports ongoing experimentation instead of working against it
04

Sales Directors & VPs

You're dealing with
  • Pricing or packaging tests that show promise but never get validated against revenue
  • Initiatives that never get tested and refined systematically
  • No account intelligence about which experiments actually influence a deal
You'll get
  • Revenue goal attainment through experiments validated against real pipeline impact
  • Higher sales velocity from continuously optimized messaging and positioning
  • Decision frameworks connecting experimentation directly to revenue
Who this isn't for
  • Companies looking for a single, isolated project rather than an ongoing system. Experimentation compounds over the full framework, not in one test.
  • Teams unwilling to actually scale a winning experiment once it's proven. The value here is turning results into practice, not running tests for their own sake.
  • Businesses without a CRM or core revenue systems in place. We validate against that data - we don't stand up the systems from nothing.
Outcomes

Strategic outcomes, measured.

KPI/01
41%
ARR growth at Patchstack after product, billing, and go-to-market data landed in one revenue model.
KPI/02
30%
Less rep time per deal on entry and reporting, once properties, scoring, and workflows were standardized.
KPI/03
2.4x
Pipeline volume at EnviroKlenz after web and attribution integration put both companies on one measurable stack.
Testimonial

Proof, not promise.

CASE FILE · NitroPack
When it comes to a high-scale revenue delivery initiative, DevriX gets the job done, period. They quickly jumped in on a partially-started project and led it to completion in record time. They worked with our team to iron out the finer details while building the full picture. Communication, attention to detail, and attentiveness were all 5-star. Stellar work.
Mihail Stoychev Co-founder, CEO of NitroPack (acquired by WP Engine)
Why Us

Why not just run experiments internally?

01

“We'll just run experiments internally when we have time.”

Internal experimentation without a dedicated framework happens in bursts, disconnected from any consistent process, and a promising result rarely turns into standard practice without someone responsible for scaling it. We bring the framework and the discipline that turns individual tests into compounding growth.

02

“Why not just hire a growth consultant for a one-time engagement?”

A one-time engagement delivers a set of recommendations, not a running system. We build the actual delivery infrastructure and validation process that keeps experimentation happening continuously, long after the initial strategy phase ends.

03

“Isn't this just conversion rate optimization?”

No - conversion optimization is one piece. We connect strategy consulting, delivery infrastructure, and revenue optimization into a single system, so experiments across the entire business get prioritized, tested, and scaled together, not run as isolated CRO projects.

We validate every experiment against real revenue impact, not vanity metrics.
We build the delivery infrastructure experiments actually need to scale.
We connect strategy, execution, and revenue optimization into one system.
We stay through scaling, not just the initial test.
Get Started

Stop running tests. Start running a system.

A 30-minute call. We'll look at your current growth initiatives and show you where a promising result never got the chance to scale. No deck.

Technical Buyer

Answers for the technical buyer.

01 Why do enterprises need experimentation as a service when exploring new verticals?

The main reason is risk mitigation. Venturing into a new vertical carries real risk, and a structured, data-driven approach to experimentation lets you assess the potential of a new strategy before committing significant investment, rather than finding out after the fact.

02 Why does risk mitigation actually matter for a growing company?

It lets you allocate resources more efficiently. Identifying and prioritizing risk means your team can focus effort on what's genuinely critical to the business, instead of spreading investment evenly across untested ideas.

03 How is this different from a traditional growth strategy engagement?

A traditional engagement usually delivers a set of recommendations and moves on. We build a dynamic, continuously running system that combines assessment, strategy, and data-driven testing, so the approach keeps adapting instead of going stale the moment the initial project ends.

04 What role does outsourcing this to an agency actually play?

An outside team brings a dynamic, cross-industry perspective and the infrastructure to run continuous experimentation, which is difficult for an internal team to build and maintain alongside its regular responsibilities.

05 Can you integrate with our existing CRM and marketing systems?

Yes. We connect experimentation and its results directly to the CRM and marketing systems you already use, so validated results feed the same reporting your team already relies on.

06 How long does the full framework take?

The core framework runs across twelve weeks - strategy consulting in the first four, delivery infrastructure in the next four, and revenue optimization in the final four - with experimentation continuing afterward as an ongoing program.