Post-Merger & Carve-Out Integration

Make add-ons and carve-outs operate as one.

Technology and systems integration for bolt-ons, roll-ups, and carve-outs, so the combined entity runs as a single business rather than several stitched together, and a divested unit stands on its own systems fast. Delivered by a senior team that has done it before, and that executes rather than hands over a plan.

  • Systems combined or separated, not just advised on
  • One reporting basis across the combined entity
  • A senior team that has done this before
Integration track record at a glance
10+
M&As facilitated
100k+
Pages migrated, traffic doubled
54%
of PE value from revenue growth
~1B
Monthly pageviews engineered

Synergies live in the model. They land, or fail to, in the systems.

Integration is where deal value leaks.

Why integration success matters

Integration is where deal value leaks.

The synergy case is written into the model, but it is realized, or lost, in the systems. The work of combining two businesses, or standing up a third from a carve-out, is where the value either lands on schedule or drains away in disruption. With returns now driven by operating improvement rather than financial engineering (industry research puts roughly 54% of PE value creation on revenue growth, per Gain.pro), a slow or broken integration does not just delay synergies. It puts the thesis itself at risk.

The ways value leaks are predictable. Delayed synergies when systems take quarters to combine and the savings never materialize on schedule. Operational disruption when the integration interrupts the business it was meant to strengthen. Technology fragmentation when duplicate platforms persist and no one owns consolidation. Reporting challenges when the combined entity cannot produce a single trusted view of itself. Revenue leakage when broken handoffs between systems drop deals, double-count pipeline, or break attribution.

The synergy gap

Synergies live in the model. They land, or fail to, in the systems.

Common post-merger and carve-out challenges

What stands between the deal and the synergy case.

  • Overlapping platforms across the combined entity, with no decision on what to keep, retire, or consolidate.

  • Data modeled differently in each business, so the systems cannot be merged into one source of truth without real work.

  • Each entity reporting on its own basis, leaving the firm unable to see the combined business clearly or quickly.

  • Go-to-market and RevOps processes that do not match, breaking pipeline, attribution, and forecasting across the merged organization.

  • Gaps and exposures, including data-privacy and GDPR risk, that surface when systems and data are combined or separated.

  • Two organizations, or a unit being separated, without a single technical owner driving the integration to a defined outcome.

How DevriX supports integration

Combine the systems, not just the org chart.

DevriX plans, migrates, and consolidates the systems, not just advises on the strategy. Integrated systems produce one consistent reporting basis, which in turn drives operational efficiency, clearer revenue visibility, and faster decision-making across the combined business.

06

Work streams that carry the synergy case into the systems.

  1. Work stream 01

    Technology consolidation

    Platform and website consolidation: deciding what to keep, retire, and migrate, and executing it, so duplicate systems do not persist as cost and risk.

  2. Work stream 02

    Data migration and governance

    Merging data into one source of truth, with the governance and ownership that keep it trustworthy as the business grows.

  3. Work stream 03

    Revenue operations alignment

    Unifying CRM and automation and aligning the revenue process across the combined entity, so pipeline, attribution, and forecasting work as one.

  4. Work stream 04

    Reporting standardization

    One reporting format across the merged business, so the firm and the board see the combined entity clearly and quickly.

  5. Work stream 05

    Process optimization

    Removing the broken and duplicated handoffs that integration tends to create, so the combined organization runs efficiently rather than carrying both legacy processes.

  6. Work stream 06

    AI and automation opportunities

    The highest-value workflows in the combined business automated and shipped to production safely, with a human approval step on anything irreversible.

Delivery example: Spotlio

Multi-brand consolidation into a single unified platform.

DevriX consolidated multiple brands and platforms (Spotlio, Catalate, Skitude, Skitude Group) into a single unified platform across the company's European and US operations, migrating content between architectures and unifying navigation and design while preserving SEO and functional integrity. A clear demonstration of the multi-brand consolidation, platform integration, system unification, operational simplification, and technical execution that integration work demands.

Delivery example of integration capability; not a stated M&A transaction outcome.

Carve-out readiness

Stand a divested unit up on its own, fast.

A carve-out has the opposite problem to a merger: a unit being separated needs its own systems stood up quickly, without the parent's infrastructure to lean on. Carve-outs deserve the same rigor as integrations. Standalone operations and independent systems have to be built, not improvised.

  1. 01 · Separation

    Systems separation

    Disentangling shared platforms and standing up the systems the divested unit needs to operate independently.

  2. 02 · Data

    Data separation

    Cleanly separating shared data and standing up the divested unit's own source of truth, so its reporting is accurate and trusted from day one.

  3. 03 · Reporting

    Independent reporting

    Reporting built for the standalone entity, so it can be run and governed on its own from day one.

  4. 04 · Continuity

    Operational continuity

    Keeping the business running through the separation, so the unit does not lose momentum during the transition.

  5. 05 · Risk

    Risk mitigation

    Closing the security, data, and compliance gaps that separation exposes, before they become problems.

  6. 06 · Scale

    Standalone scalability

    Systems and infrastructure built so the separated unit can scale on its own rather than against the limits of what it inherited.

Expected outcomes

01

Faster integration

Systems combined or separated on a timeline that protects the synergy case.

02

Reduced disruption

The business kept running through the transition rather than interrupted by it.

03

Better reporting visibility

A single trusted view of the combined or standalone entity, available quickly.

04

Accelerated synergy realization

The savings and revenue in the model landing on schedule because the systems support them.

05

Improved operational efficiency

One coherent set of systems and processes rather than two legacy stacks carried in parallel.

Trusted by teams at

  • Escape Hunt
  • SwimSwam
  • Brainjolt
  • TechSmith
  • American Restoration
  • TrekTravel
  • Angel Reyes

Why DevriX

Done before, and built to execute.

  • We consolidate or separate the systems, not just plan the move
  • We have facilitated more than 10 M&As
  • We align RevOps and reporting so the combined view is trustworthy
  • We carry full context from diligence through integration

Proof points

A verifiable track record.

Evidence across integration and migration work.

M&As facilitated
10+
Pages migrated, 2× traffic
100k+
Recurring revenue
92%
Clutch, top-rated B2B
4.8★
Also tracked
  • 15y embedded
  • 5–10y avg. tenure
  • 400+ engagements
  • ~1B pageviews

Delivery examples

Multi-brand consolidation, large-scale migration, and operational scale: the capabilities integration and carve-out work demand.

01Delivery example

Escape Hunt

Delivery partner whose work led the same group to bring DevriX in for Boom Battle Bar, with a working site for every location.

02Tenure

SwimSwam

10+ years leading the path for the number one swimming media in the US through a series of engineering products and scalability innovations.

03Tenure

Brainjolt

Managing product, data, and engineering over the course of 8 years, through nearly a 10X growth stage in the first several years.

04Tenure

TechSmith

8 years of platform unification, synergy consolidation, and modernization of multiple solutions onto a proprietary FOSS multilingual build.

05Tenure

American Restoration

Bringing 25 brands under one multisite, so each post-acquisition integration is streamlined and each new brand has a scalable technical foundation for hitting revenue targets.

06Delivery example

TrekTravel

+25% YoY online bookings after a new Express Checkout flow, which drove 15% of that growth.

07Delivery example

Angel Reyes

182% YoY increase in website-driven signed cases after a platform rebuild with 100% uptime during migration.

"10+ M&As facilitated" is a company-reported count, not externally audited, and is not a count of integration or carve-out engagements of a specific type. Carve-out experience is positioned as a capability; no carve-out engagement is named. Delivery examples show integration and migration capability, not stated M&A transaction outcomes.

Get started

Make the combined business run as one.

Scope an integration or carve-out with the team that executes it. We consolidate or separate the systems, unify the data and reporting, and align the revenue engine, so the synergy case in the model is realized in the business.